Adaptation Thought Leadership and Analysis (ATLAS)
As a consequence of the region's high level of vulnerability and relative lack of adaptive capacity, the need for technical support and capacity building is particularly acute in Africa. The Africa Regional program is allocating $1,075,000 in direct GCC-AD funds to the ATLAS contract to be awarded in September, 2014. This investment supports bilateral analysis in Africa Bureau countries, thought leadership in emerging areas of adaptation, and expert workshops and meetings related to technical areas of adaptation or in support of USAID staff working on adaptation and integration. Countries that will directly benefit from the analysis include Ethiopia and Mozambique. All countries receiving adaptation funds will benefit from the thought leadership and workshops, including Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda, as well as the regional missions East Africa, West Africa, and Southern Africa.
This program area covers components of program design and performance management and learning. This area supports assessment, special studies and analysis, strategic planning, program and project design, program monitoring (to include baseline studies and other data collection needs) and activities that support learning, knowledge transfer and adaptation of projects. Assessment includes the examination of the state of a country or sector context to inform project design but does not include evaluation of USG-funded activities (please see Program Area PO.3 for a definition of evaluation). Special studies or analysis could support strategic or project planning or include research for general learning that is not necessarily related to the performance of USG-funded activities. This program area may also include the preparation of strategic plans and other short-term programming tasks, assessment of the potential of information and communication technologies to enhance performance throughout the program cycle or dissemination of best practices and lessons learned. Evaluation is the systematic collection and analysis of information about the characteristics and outcomes of programs and projects as a basis for judgments, to improve effectiveness and inform decisions about current and future programming. Evaluations are distinct from (a) needs assessments, which are designed to examine country or sector context to inform project design, (b) internal informal reviews of projects and (c) audits (conducted either internally or by an external audience). Such efforts should not be included in PO.3. However, evaluability assessments -- those assessments completed with the purpose of determining whether or not an evaluation of an activity can be conducted -- should be included in PO.3. This program area should include all evaluations designed and funded with foreign assistance funding, including the components of contracts with task orders for evaluations (regardless of the mechanism). It should also include all independent contractors hired solely to produce an evaluation(s); all other contractors (e.g., those whose job responsibilities may include support or management of evaluation but not the production of an evaluation as a deliverable) should be placed in PO.2. Sustain the productivity of the agricultural sector through investments that foster increasing returns to land, labor, and capital. Targeted interventions to male and female producers provide improvements in technology and management practices, expanded access to markets and credit, increased organizational and market efficiency, and restoration and protection of resiliency in production and livelihood systems. Improve nutrient quality, dietary diversity, and safety of food supply across agriculture value chains during production, post-harvest processing and storage; build awareness of agriculture sector actors at national and local levels on nutrition; promote the production and utilization of nutritious biofortified crops at the household farm level; and promote markets for foods that are particularly important for nutrition and that smallholder farmers produce.
- Project ID
US-GOV-1-LR-AID-OAA-TO-14-00046
- Activity status
- 3 - Completion
- Aid type
- C01 - Project-type interventions
- % to Liberia
- 100.00
Organisations
- Accountable
- U.S. Agency for International Development
- Extending
- U.S. Agency for International Development
- Funding
- U.S. Agency for International Development
- Implementing
- International Development Group, LLC
Disbursements by fiscal year, quarter
Fiscal year |
Fiscal quarter |
Value (USD) |
Liberia Value (USD) |
2017 |
Q1 |
114,517.24 |
114,517.24 |
2016 |
Q4 |
405,056.76 |
405,056.76 |
2016 |
Q2 |
335,424.33 |
335,424.33 |
2016 |
Q1 |
268,338.55 |
268,338.55 |
2015 |
Q4 |
664,278.67 |
664,278.67 |
2015 |
Q3 |
142,575.45 |
142,575.45 |
2014 |
Q4 |
173,123.00 |
173,123.00 |
Commitments by fiscal year, quarter
Fiscal year |
Fiscal quarter |
Value (USD) |
Liberia Value (USD) |
2015 |
Q4 |
519,574.00 |
519,574.00 |
2015 |
Q1 |
1,410,617.00 |
1,410,617.00 |
2014 |
Q3 |
173,123.00 |
173,123.00 |
MTEF projections by fiscal year
Fiscal year |
Value (USD) |
Liberia Value (USD) |
2016 |
125,000.00 |
125,000.00 |
2015 |
375,000.00 |
375,000.00 |
CRS code |
% |
Agricultural policy and administrative management
(31110)
|
5.73
|
Agricultural development
(31120)
|
24.7
|
Multisector aid
(43010)
|
69.57
|